ADA Round-Up: Legislative Access and Government Captions

Jun 25 2019 David Titmus
Row of law books on a shelf

Popular posts

Cell phone laying on a desk near a computer keyboard with the Twitch logo displayed on the phone screen
How to Add Captions to Twitch How to Add Captions to Twitch
lamp on desk
So You Want to Be a VITAC Realtime Captioner… So You Want to Be a VITAC Realtime Captioner…

Related posts

A girl sitting on the couch with tv remote pointed at the tv screen that has picture of tree branches and open captions
VITAC Combines AI Technology, Experience to Deliver Exceptional Caption and Transcription Quality  VITAC Combines AI Technology, Experience to Deliver Exceptional Caption and Transcription Quality 
Close up of hands working on a business document.
ADA Round-Up: Survey Sheds Light on Workplace Discrimination; Beauty Company Pays $75K to Settle Suit ADA Round-Up: Survey Sheds Light on Workplace Discrimination; Beauty Company Pays $75K to Settle Suit

Welcome to this month’s edition of “ADA in the News,” featuring recent news, updates, events, and rulings regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Legislative Sessions Lack Captions

ADA header showing "ADA in the News" text placed over a photo of a newspaperThe 11th Circuit Court is considering a claim involving Florida’s lack of closed captions on its legislative session’s online videos.

The case, filed by the National Association of the Deaf (NAD) and a disability rights activist, claims Florida’s refusal to provide captions for legislative proceedings violates federal law, including Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Title II makes it illegal for local governments to discriminate against individuals who are disabled when providing services, programs, or activities.

Both the state Senate and House of Representatives live stream their legislative proceedings without captions. Florida officials have argued that providing captioning would be cost prohibitive.

In a brief to the court, NAD argued that while Florida boasts about the availability of broadcast legislative proceedings, state officials deny those who are deaf or hard of hearing that same opportunity to meaningfully participate and watch the state’s legislature.

A federal court earlier denied Florida’s motion to dismiss the suit, rejecting the argument that the state is entitled to 11th Amendment sovereign immunity protections, which shield state governments from civil liability in federal court.

Also in dispute is whether Florida’s lack of captions violates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, which applies to government programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance.

Texas House Accessibility

A Texas man is arguing that the state house is violating the requirements of the Americans with Disability Act by refusing to provide captions for its legislative hearings.

The man, who is partially deaf and can only hear low-pitch vowel sounds, typically relies on CART (Communication Access Realtime Translation) services when attending government meetings. CART requires a captioner listen to an event in real time and create captions that the viewer can then read via portable screen.


The state Capitol denied the man’s request for the service, with officials saying that it “was not reasonable or feasible” and cited unspecified costs and difficulties in coordinating live events. Instead, the man was offered American Sign Language services and FM assistive listening devices, per the House’s policy.

The man, however, says those options do not work for him as assisted listening devices serve no him no benefit and he does not use ASL. He is continuing to seek the accommodations he requested under the ADA.

Police Settlement

The Massachusetts Environmental Police settled a federal lawsuit by a former employee who is hard of hearing who claimed that the department violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, discriminated against him because of his disability, and wrongfully fired him.


The state paid $95,000 to settle the lawsuit that initially was filed in 2015.

According to the lawsuit, the man was hired by the environmental police in 2011 and disclosed his disability during job interviews. However, a few months after being hired, he was demoted and reassigned to a new job.

The man alleged that his supervisors discriminated against him because of his disability and said in the complaint filed in federal court that he was harassed, excluded from meetings, and given low performance ratings due to communication problems stemming from his disability.

The man complained to human resources in 2013 and requested accommodations for his disability. The Massachusetts Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing recommended several accommodations, such as a communication system to use for meetings, but the requests were denied, and he was fired in 2014.

The environmental police denied the allegations in court briefs, and asked that the case be dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.

VITAC Can Help

A full-service accessible media services company, VITAC provides captions for government meetings, television shows, corporate boardrooms, school classrooms, sold-out sporting events, and everything in between. We literally helped write the book on caption accuracy, and worked with the Federal Communications Commission to help create the Closed Caption Quality Best Practices guide.

Our services include live and offline captioning, Spanish captioning and translation into more than 50 languages, and subtitling, audio description, and encoding services.